Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.A00) – reviews
The service has collected 15 positive and negative reviews from over 6 sources.
Read the pros and cons of the Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.A00) lawnmower. Compare prices in different online stores and find out the characteristics of the Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.A00) lawn mower. In their reviews, users have described all the pros and cons of the Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.A00) lawn mower.
The average score is 4.1 points. We also offer alternatives and reviews of products that are counterparts of lawn mowers.
You can also leave a detailed review of the Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.A00) lawn mower.
Reviews on lawn mower Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.A00)
Comment: I bought this same model for the second time, the first worked 4 years (Rotak 32) (went out of order through my fault) I bought a Rotak 320, immediately disassembled, was pleasantly surprised, the weak point of the previous model have corrected and added electricity. I am very satisfied. I can’t think of anything better for my money but it is too expensive to buy cheap (Chinese) models.
Cons: It is hard to buy parts for the engine, it is easier to buy a new mower. This is my second mower, my first was ROTAK 32.
Pros: Mows very high grass. Very light volume. Turns off if it overheats.
Недостатки: Отжила 2 покоса участка в 8 соток, половина которого занята постройками. Вовремя не отключилась при перегреве, поэтому расплавился пластик на корпусе около ножа => Mower became unusable because the melted body now prevents the blade from spinning. Repairs are impractical, cost almost as much as a new mower.
Pros: Makes excellent mowing both on flat lawns and on bumps.
Comments: Used for 2 seasons without any problems, we were very satisfied. The engine stopped working because of overheating, the bearing flew out. So the engine is working and everything seems to be simple, I changed the bearing and continued working, but no, in the service center I was offered to replace: motor – 1300r; housing-1700r; cover housing a-570r working yu-680r Total: 4250r at the price of a new 4000r would be wiser to agree to buy a new. My opinion is that the manufacturer artificially inflates the cost of parts and labor – this is their marketing ploy to get the buyer to buy a new product. I did exactly that, using this approach, I bought a new mower from another manufacturer. As it is, the product is good, it’s handy as a household item for a small area, but before the first mishap befalls you, remember this. Information: I repaired the lawnmower myself, bought a bearing at an auto market for 100 rubles and changed it. Lubricated with lithol, works fine. So it’s not just a matter of marketing, they don’t want to work either.
Pros: Lightweight, handy, affordable.
Comment: The Rotak 320 is a good mower. Convenient, powerful enough and the most important is light! Both old people and children can easily work with it. Not once have I regretted having taken this mower for 3.5-4 thousand roubles, and not the heavy one for 1.5 thousand roubles. The mower withstands 3 years of intensive exploitation on 30 hectares. The same breakdowns occur repeatedly. 1) first, the plastic body parts break and break off (from branches and other objects falling on the blade). 2) then the plastic power handle breaks (you have to tighten it with a knitting wire) 3) the bearing breaks (roller bearings are suitable) You can use it to shred grass of any height by throwing it on top, as it is very light. You can mow without the grass box, then it won’t get clogged with wet grass. Again, carrying it over bumps and bumps is not difficult because of its lightness. If you set the cutting height to 6 cm, you will cut 40 cm of grass with stinging nettles, burdocks and co. Then set the height to minimum and repeat. But mowing low and very dense grass will require more power.
Pros: Convenience. Lightness.
The commentary: The device works in rather difficult conditions since the fourth season, mows any grass at the setting of 4-6 cm. Replaced by 2 bearings, no other failures detected. The specified lack requires obligatory cleaning of the engine compartment from dirt after each use (it is a pity that I learned about it myself only after the jamming of the knife because of the bearing). For this purpose it is enough to unscrew the screw on the cover, take it off, give it a good shake and put it back. If the blade rotates with difficulty, most likely the bearing seat of the lower drive is broken and the bearing itself is defective. The drive with the motor is easy to remove: remove the cover, unscrew the blade screw and unscrew the 4 self-tapping screws from the bottom. The bearing (32x15x9) is centered in the seating with metal shims, depending on the wear of the seating it can be easily replaced if necessary. Overall, the design is simple and maintainable. Even if something goes wrong, I will take the same one – very light and handy.
Disadvantages: Air for engine cooling is taken from the working space of the blade, which leads to intensive throwing in the engine of small debris and moisture from wet grass, which is essentially the cause of failures.
Pros: Light weight, economical, reasonable price, good performance with proper maintenance, relatively easy to repair with your own hands.
Comment: Give you what you need. My advice.
Cons: Haven’t found any yet!
Pros: It’s a great model! Lightweight, maneuverable, mows great even on bumps. We bought it in winter and it was much cheaper, but now the price is not expensive.
Comments: I can recommend the Rotac 320 and that’s the only one. Even elderly people can (without difficulty!) mow the lawn or not really lawn, you need excellent hard and tall grass. And the most important thing – the power doesn’t drop when hitting a bump or a stone – some crazy torque, not on paper, but in reality. It would be OK, but they say that they’ve stopped making it. Maybe I should buy another one as a spare.
Disadvantages: Not a bug, more of a comment. This is our second Rotak 320. The first worked for 8 years, then blew the sleeve (replaced myself with a similar one from the auto parts), and then broke the brush holder, which is only sold together with the motor. Picked the Makita Elm320, I thought it was a great replacement. You can read the review of this miracle. It was impossible to use it and I urgently had to look for the Rotak 320 again. Let me tell you, who drove a classic and then moved to a VW – the feeling is the same! – Lightness, maneuverability, lawn quality, tough, convenient basket for collecting grass.
Advantages: very light! Compared with the Makita Elm3710 – a fluff. At the same time it is powerful. Where Makita chokes and has to readjust for lifting, it goes without full engine revolutions. It mows very cleanly, the fishing basket does not fall out like the Makita. It is very maneuverable. Has the most comfortable handle.
Comments: I think with moderate use this product can last 5 years. Or maybe longer, if you only mow a small lawn in front of the house. Don’t even know if this is recommended.
Disadvantages: Grass gradually gets carried into the engine compartment by the airflow and can cause the end to jam and burn out. Which is what happened to me at the end of my second season of using the comp. The engine is not obsolete. Only the entire unit has been replaced, which also houses the gearbox. The fan wheel is clearly loose.
The advantages: the low price. Low weight. Can be operated without a waste basket if you put something under the lid so that it does not close.
Comment: But it is a pleasure to mow under 4 cm. The lawn is just like a soccer field, the mower is not overloaded, you do not have to mow every 10 sq. m. to throw the grass. Please note that it has 3 preset cutting heights 2, 4 and 6 cm. There are no other options. Due to the fact that it is lightweight, it is controlled with one hand, and the second wire is checked. And the heavy would have to push with two hands, and not enough hands on the wire. In the shed, I hung it on the handle on a nail – and it almost does not take up space. For my money – a miracle of technology!
Disadvantages: From 2 cm high it can be too little power – begins to growl reluctantly on stubborn grasses. However, this can not be considered a disadvantage, because then it is terrible to look at the lawn less than 2 cm – bare and visible earth, the rest of the grass has turned yellow in one day.
Advantages: simple! Only 7 kg! Runs more quietly than a gasoline-powered lawnmower. It takes about half as much time to cut the grass as a lawn trimmer, 4 times less effort and 10 times less nerve.
Comment: On the third year of use, the wave began to spin, the camping was off. Please advise how to change.
Disadvantages: blades blunt quickly.
Advantages: lightweight, easy to use.
Comment: we will buy the same lawnmower)))
Disadvantages: Served the indicated 3 years and is retired. The engine burned out.
Advantages: very easy to use. It is written that it is only for flat surfaces, but our area is not perfectly flat and did a great job. Even cuts through the gravel)) So that the durability is all right))) and the price is very happy)))
Comment: not reliable enough.
Disadvantages: But after three years of non-intensive use (lawn about 40 sq.m. 15-18 times a season) ripped off the motor airflow bike (the wedges are worn out).
Advantages: lightweight, comfortable.
Comment: The unit sang decently for seven years, was operated to the tail and to the mane (except for the knife). Apparently I should have looked in at least occasionally – when smoking this summer, it turned out that everything inside was clogged with debris. I cleaned it out, but it was too late. Where else would I have found the same thing?
Disadvantages: You say this model has been discontinued. And the new incarnation with the jaws of an imperial cruiser from Star Wars is pouring out at a dismal rate, judging by the reviews.
Advantages: 1. Low weight-it’s easy for the wife22 to work with. Takes very high grass without much effort, which is very important for rare trips out of town. It is not afraid of bumps, cones, it is gentle 4. It is possible to save a knife rather elementary. 5. Reliability
Comment: I am very satisfied with the product. Now looking for the same one. Or try to fix it. It is desirable not to mow bumps, branches and hard grass – it does not like it very much. Practically does not clog, and if it clogs, it is with the traction net, which is clogged to a halt. Lightweight and maneuverable lawn mower. He was very happy with it, but it ended up a piece of brick. It was very miserable.
Disadvantages: Mows low grass height according to the instructions – 30 cm.
Advantages: It lasted 5 seasons without any problems. It is only necessary to clean and remove the lid in time.
Comment: My 2 mowers lasted 4 seasons. As soon as I prevented – I cleaned and lubricated, the device is very simple and easy to disassemble. After sharpening, the knives sharpen well, no imbalance. Stoning is tolerated without consequences. It is a very good option for rolling 3-4 acres.
Disadvantages: gets stuck in thick and soft lawns
Advantages: sturdy, comfortable.
Characteristics of lawn mower Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.a00)
|Special width||32 cm|
|Grass catcher||Rigid belt 28 liters|
|Mowing height||20-60 mm|
|Setting mowing height||Yes, manually|
|Grass output||Into the grass catcher box|
|Handle||Wrinkle with adjustable height|
|Number of bikes||Four-wheeled|
|transmission||Grass catcher, disk/blade|
|features||Country of production – UK, torque 13 Nm|
Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.
Overall rating: 123
The Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.a00) total score consists of 1,497 lawnmowers, using a special algorithm based on 7,911 real customer reviews and taking into account the popularity of the model.
Other products with a similar rating:
Overall review: 122
Comment: very sorry for the money given away. The mower is not worth it. I would like to try the Bosch blade.
Disadvantages: The metal on the blade is very soft. Bent the screw after cutting a Lupine bush.
Advantages: I did not have enough time to appreciate it, because the knife went out of order almost immediately.
Comments: Before this trimmer I finally mowed a normal lawn, which can already be compensated by mowing. First of all, I decided to buy the simplest and cheapest model. I chose more or less known brands and settled on Daewoo, the low price was a nice bribe. It all looks reliable and has a good strong plastic. I also liked the work, the engine runs smoothly, without odd noises, it is pretty quiet, the model is very light, but the grass cuts well, even the lawn turns out. Everything corresponds to an inexpensive mower.
Disadvantages: Problematic to mow without the grass mowing collar, closes the back cover and does not let the grass get out, which is blocked by the knife in the compartment. Set the wire so that the cover does not close completely
Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.a00)
We have gathered for you 15 positive and negative customer and expert reviews about the Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.a00) lawn mower. The average rating of buyers was 4.07 points. In their ratings, users described all the disadvantages and advantages of the Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.a00) lawn mower. If you have had experience using the Bosch Rotak 320 (0.600.885.a00) lawnmower – write your rating and share it with other customers!
Bosch Lawnmower Rotak 320 (0.600.885.a00) Reviews
An excellent model! Lightweight, maneuverable, mows great even with bumps. Bought in the winter, it was much cheaper, but now the price is not expensive.
While not found!
For the country side is what you need. I recommend it.
Lightweight, comfortable and affordable.
Worked for 2 seasons without any problems and were very satisfied. Started to shut down due to overheating, went out of camp. So the engine works and everything seems to be simple, I changed the stock and continued to work, but no, I was offered to change the service center: engine – 1300r; housing-1700r; cover housing a-570r works a-680r total: 4250r at a new price 4000r would be wiser to agree to a new purchase. My opinion is that the manufacturer artificially inflates the cost of parts and labor, according to their marketing trick, so that the buyer would buy a new product. This is exactly what I did, with this approach I bought a new mower from another manufacturer. And so the product is good, practical to use as a household item for a small area, but remember, before the first failure befalls you. Information: I repaired the lawnmower myself, bought at the car market for 100 rubles and changed it. Lubricated with lithol, works great. So it’s not just a matter of marketing, they also do not want to work.
Low price. Low weight. Can work without trapping basket, if you put something under the lid so it will not close.
Grass is gradually carried into the engine compartment by the air flow and in the end can lead to jamming and fire. Which is what happened to me at the end of my second season of using the comp. The engine is not obsolete. Only the entire unit is replaced, which also houses the transmission. The fan wheel is obviously loose.
I think with moderate use it could last 5 years. And probably longer if you just mow a little lawn in front of the house. I don’t even know if this is recommended.
Lightweight!!! Only 7 pounds! Runs quiet compared to the Benzo. Mowing now takes half the time compared to a lawn trimmer, 4 times less effort and 10 times less nerve.
Perhaps not enough strength if you mow a height of 2 cm – it begins to growl resentfully at the clumps of perennial grass. However, this may not be a disadvantage, because then the lawn less than 2 cm is scary to look at – bare and visible earth, the remains of the grass yellowed in one day.
But mowing less than 4 cm is a pleasure. The lawn is just like a soccer field, the mower is not overloaded, you don’t have to mow it every 10 sq. m. to throw the grass away. Note that it has 3 preset cutting heights 2,4,6 cm. There are no other options available. Because it is lightweight, it is controlled with one hand and the second wire checks. And the heavy would have to push with two hands, and not enough hands on the wire. In the shed, I hung it on the handle on a nail – and it almost does not take up space. For my money – a miracle of technology!
Very easy! In comparison with Makita ELM3710 – it is a trifle. It is powerful at the same time. There where Makita is choking and it is necessary to increase it a little, to increase at full engine rpm. It mows very clean, the grass catcher box falls out as Makita has. Nimble. The handle is easy to grip.
Rather not a disadvantage, but a remark. It is our second rotary 320. The first worked for 8 years, after which the bearing flew (I replaced it myself with similar auto parts), and then broke the brush holder, which is only sold with the motor assembly. Decided to buy an ELM320 Makita, found a great replacement. You can read the review of this miracle. It was impossible to use it and I had to look urgently for a rotary 320. I’ll tell you, who drove a classic and then moved to a Volkswagen – it’s the same experience! – Lightness, maneuverability, turf quality, hard comfortable grass catcher box.
I can Roat 320 and only recommend it. Even an elderly person can (without difficulty!) Mow the lawn or not quite a lawn, hard and tall grass takes excellent. And the most important is that power doesn’t drop when hitting a bump or a stone – crazy torque, not on paper but in practice. Everything is good, but you have to let it go. Another one or buy something to spare?
Mows both lawns and bumps perfectly.
Отжила 2 покоса участка в 8 соток, половина которого занята постройками. Вовремя не отключилась при перегреве, поэтому расплавился пластик на корпусе около ножа => Mower became unusable because the melted body now prevents the blade from spinning. Repairs are impractical, cost almost as much as a new mower.
Very easy to use. It says only for surfaces, but our area is not perfect and it is treated well. Even shreds the gravel))) so that the power is all right))) and the price is very happy)))
Served the indicated 3 years and to rest. The motor burned out.
Will buy the same new high speed mower))))
Pays for a thick and soft lawn
2 mowers worked 4 seasons. Once a preventive maintenance – cleaned and lubricated, the device is very simple, easy to disassemble the device. After sharpening, the blades sharpen well, imbalance does not appear. No consequences from stone strokes. Very good option for 3-4 acres of lawn.
The Rotak 320 is a good mower. Comfortable, powerful enough and most importantly bright! Old people and children can easily work with it. I’ve never regretted that I bought it for 3,5-4 thousand roubles, and not heavy for 1,5 thousand roubles. I have already used up the resources of two mowers. The mower holds 3 GDA with intensive use on 30 hectares of land. The mass will be repeated all at once. 1) At first the plastic body parts break off (from branches and other objects hitting the blade) and break off and break off. 2) Then the plastic handle gives a break in the switch (you need to tighten the knitting wire) 3). that it is very easy. You can mow without the grass box, then it won’t get clogged with wet grass. Again, because of its lightness, it’s not hard to carry over bumps and inconveniences. When you use a mowing height of 6 cm, it mows 40 cm of grass with nettles, burdocks and more. Then set the height to minimum and repeat. But you need more power to mow low and very dense grass.
Low weight, economy, reasonable price, good performance with proper care, simple enough repair with your own hands will do.
The air for engine cooling is taken from the working cavity of the blade, which leads to intensive watering of small debris and moisture ingress from wet grass into the engine, which is mainly the cause of failures.
The device works in enough difficult conditions for the fourth season and shreds the grass at installation on 4-6 cm. Two bearings are replaced, there are no other failures. The above-mentioned disadvantage requires the obligatory cleaning of the engine cavity from debris (it is a pity that I discovered it only after pushing the knife out from behind the stockpile). To do this, just unload the self-tapping screw on the cover, remove it, give everything a good shake, and put it back in. If the knife is stunned, the lower drive bearing socket is probably broken and the stub itself has failed. The motor drive is very easy to remove: With the cover removed, unscrew the blade screw and drain the 4 screws from the bottom. Depending on the wear on the socket, the stock (32x15x9) is centered with metal plates. All in all, the design is simple and waiting. Even if it fails, I’ll take the same one – very easy and convenient.
The model is lightweight and easy to use.
The knife gets blunt quickly.
The shaft began to rotate in the third year of use, apparently the shroud flew. Please advise how to change it.
The fifth season was served without any problems. Only need time to clean and remove the cover.
The cutting height of low grass according to the instructions is 30 cm.
I am very happy with the purchase. Now I’m looking for the same one. Or to try to repair it. It is desirable not to mow bumps, branches and hard grass – it does not like it very much. Practically does not clog, and if it does clog, it is with the traction net, which is clogged up to the point of failure. It’s a lightweight and maneuverable lawn mower. He was very happy with it, but it ended up a piece of brick. It was a real shame.
Mowed very tall grass. Very lightweight. Turned off when it overheated.
Hard to buy replacement engine parts. Easier to buy a new mower. This is my second, the first was a Rotak 32.
I bought the second time the same model that worked the first (Rotak 32) 4 years (failed due to my fault) Rotak 320 at once, the weakness of the previous model pleasantly surprised and the performance has increased. Very satisfied. For this money there is nothing better, and to take a cheap model (China) is more expensive.
1. Low weight – easy to work with my wife2. Takes very high grass without much effort, which is very important for rare trips out of town. Not afraid of bumps, cones, meek 4. The knife is quite elementary can be restrained. 5. Reliability
They say that this model is no longer in production. And the new incarnation with the mouth of the imperial cruiser from Star Wars is pouring in at a dismal rate, judging by the reviews.
The machine has been repulsed with dignity for seven years, with no maintenance (except sharpening the blade). Apparently, I should have looked into it from time to time, though – when it started to smoke this summer, it turned out that everything inside was clogged with debris. I cleaned it out, but it was too late. Where else would I have found the same thing?
After three years of non-intensive use (lawn area of about 40 square meters 15-18 times per season), the engine began to hum (the cracks were standing).